A Samsung não poderá mais usar exemplos fictícios de tablet como evidência de que o dispositivo foi uma criação surgida antes do iPad, na batalha judicial contra a Apple, que corre em corte da Califórnia, nos Estados Unidos. Segundo o site The Verge, o material rejeitado pela juíza Lucy Koh inclui imagens do filme 2001: Uma Odisseia no Espaço e cenas de um programa de televisão britânico, chamado Tomorrow People.
Apesar de já ter usado imagens de 2001... em 2011, a empresa sul-coreana não havia divulgado que pretendia utilizar esse e outros exemplos para questionar a validade das patentes de design da Apple. O juiz Paul Grewal já tinha decidido que a Samsung não poderia mudar de ideia sobre o uso do material apresentado, porque a Apple não teria tempo hábil para preparar a resposta, e a juíza Koh concorda neste ponto.
A juíza também rejeitou o uso de provas como um design para iPhone inspirado no estilo da Sony criado em 2006 por um designer da Apple, Shin Nishibori, e um tablet projetado em 1994.
O julgamento Apple x Samsung
Um júri formado por 10 pessoas irá decidir se alguma das empresas quebrou alguma patente da concorrente no desenvolvimento de seus produtos. O julgamento do caso no tribunal de San José, na California, é o primeiro de uma série de processos que as empresas movem contra a outra em 10 países.
Um júri formado por 10 pessoas irá decidir se alguma das empresas quebrou alguma patente da concorrente no desenvolvimento de seus produtos. O julgamento do caso no tribunal de San José, na California, é o primeiro de uma série de processos que as empresas movem contra a outra em 10 países.
A Apple pede na Justiça uma reparação de mais de US$ 2,5 bilhões, alegando que a Samsung se tornou líder no mercado de smartphones copiando o design, as funcionalidades e a aparência geral dos seus produtos. A companhia americana tenta provar ao júri que a sul-coreana quebrou nove de suas patentes no desenvolvimento de mais de 20 produtos, entre eles o smartphone Galaxy S II e o tablet Galaxy Tab 10.1.
Já a Samsung diz que a Apple está tentando reprimir a competição com o bloqueio da venda de seus produtos, diminuindo a escolha dos consumidores para "manter seus lucros historicamente exorbitantes". A sul-coreana alega que a Apple quebrou duas patentes essenciais para transmissão de dados 3G e outras três sobre funcionalidades dos aparelhos.
Samsung will not be able to use fictitious examples of tablet as evidence that the device was a creation that arose before the iPad, the legal battle against Apple, which runs in California court, the United States. According to the website The Verge, the material rejected by Judge Lucy Koh includes images from the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey and scenes of a British television program called Tomorrow People.
Although he has used images of 2001 ... in 2011, the South Korean company had not disclosed that he intended to use this and other examples to question the validity of design patents from Apple. Judge Paul Grewal had already decided that Samsung could not change his mind about the use of the material presented, because Apple would not have time to prepare the response, and Judge Koh agrees on this point.
The judge also rejected the use of evidence as a design iPhone-inspired Sony created in 2006 by an Apple designer, Shin Nishibori, and a tablet designed in 1994.
The trial x Apple Samsung
A jury of 10 people will decide whether any of the companies broke a competitor's patent in the development of its products. The trial court in San Jose, California, is the first of a series of processes that move against the other companies in 10 countries.
Apple seeks redress in the courts of more than $ 2.5 billion, claiming that Samsung has become a leader in the smartphone market by copying the design, functionality and overall appearance of their products. The American company tries to prove to the jury that the South Korean broke nine of its patents in the development of more than 20 products, including the Galaxy S II smartphone and tablet Galaxy Tab 10.1.
Have Samsung says that Apple is trying to suppress competition by blocking the sale of its products, reducing consumer choice "to keep their profits historically exorbitant." South Korea claims that Apple broke two essential patents for 3G data transmission and other features on three of the devices.
Although he has used images of 2001 ... in 2011, the South Korean company had not disclosed that he intended to use this and other examples to question the validity of design patents from Apple. Judge Paul Grewal had already decided that Samsung could not change his mind about the use of the material presented, because Apple would not have time to prepare the response, and Judge Koh agrees on this point.
The judge also rejected the use of evidence as a design iPhone-inspired Sony created in 2006 by an Apple designer, Shin Nishibori, and a tablet designed in 1994.
The trial x Apple Samsung
A jury of 10 people will decide whether any of the companies broke a competitor's patent in the development of its products. The trial court in San Jose, California, is the first of a series of processes that move against the other companies in 10 countries.
Apple seeks redress in the courts of more than $ 2.5 billion, claiming that Samsung has become a leader in the smartphone market by copying the design, functionality and overall appearance of their products. The American company tries to prove to the jury that the South Korean broke nine of its patents in the development of more than 20 products, including the Galaxy S II smartphone and tablet Galaxy Tab 10.1.
Have Samsung says that Apple is trying to suppress competition by blocking the sale of its products, reducing consumer choice "to keep their profits historically exorbitant." South Korea claims that Apple broke two essential patents for 3G data transmission and other features on three of the devices.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário